He also wrote the USA's most-saved article of 2021, according to Pocket.Ĭhris was a PCWorld columnist for two years. Beyond the web, his work has appeared in the print edition of The New York Times (September 9, 2019) and in PCWorld's print magazines, specifically in the August 2013 and July 2013 editions, where his story was on the cover. With over a decade of writing experience in the field of technology, Chris has written for a variety of publications including The New York Times, Reader's Digest, IDG's PCWorld, Digital Trends, and MakeUseOf. Chris has personally written over 2,000 articles that have been read more than one billion times-and that's just here at How-To Geek. If you don't have a choice, get the 32-bit version and don't worry about it.Ĭhris Hoffman is the former Editor-in-Chief of How-To Geek. In short, if you have a choice, definitely grab the 64-bit version of your app. The 32-bit program can run just fine on a 64-bit version of Windows, and there'd be no noticeable advantages with a 64-bit version. Even if they provided a 64-bit version of Evernote, users likely wouldn't notice a difference at all. They have to provide and support two separate versions of the program, as people running a 32-bit version of Windows can't use the 64-bit version.Īnd in many apps, people just wouldn't notice a difference anyway. Let's take the Windows desktop version of Evernote as an example here. They have to make sure the existing code compiles and runs correctly as 64-bit software. You can still run most ten-year-old 32-bit Windows programs on a 64-bit version of Windows today, even if their developers haven't updated them since 64-bit versions of Windows came along.Ī developer that wants to provide a 64-bit version of their program has to do additional work. Many apps haven't made the leap, though, and most never will. In a 64-bit version of Windows, 32-bit apps run under something named the Windows 32-bit on Windows 64-bit (WoW64) compatibility layer-a full subsystem that handles running 32-bit apps. Your 32-bit Windows programs will run about the same as they would on a 32-bit version of Windows (and in some cases, even better), so there's no downside to running these programs on a 64- bit OS. For example, you're not going to suffer any kind of performance penalty by running 32-bit apps. Still, these are differences that you're just not likely to notice running regular apps in the real world. And 64-bit apps can access much more memory directly than the 4 GB that 32-bit apps can access. When possible, running a 64-bit version of the app provides additional security features to apps that are likely to come under attack. After all, 32-bit apps aren't taking full advantage of the 64-bit architecture. On the surface, it might seem like running 32-bit apps in a 64-bit environment is bad-or less than ideal, anyway. Related: Why the 64-bit Version of Windows is More Secure Is Running 32-bit Apps on 64-bit Windows a Bad Idea?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |